Autonomous Workflows

Understanding how Dropstone Agent works independently on complex tasks

One of Dropstone Agent's most powerful features is its ability to work autonomously on tasks it's confident about. This guide explains how autonomous operation works and how to use it effectively.

What is Autonomous Operation?

Traditional Assistant:

You: "Add validation to the user form"
Agent: "May I read UserForm.tsx?"
You: [Approve]
Agent: "May I modify UserForm.tsx?"
You: [Approve]
Agent: "May I create validation.ts?"
You: [Approve]
[... 10 more approvals ...]

Autonomous Operation:

You: "Add validation to the user form"
Agent: [High confidence - works autonomously]
      "Adding validation following your established patterns...
      ✓ Read UserForm.tsx
      ✓ Created validation schema
      ✓ Updated form component
      ✓ Added error messages
      ✓ Generated tests
      ✓ All tests passing

      Complete! Ready for review."

How Autonomous Mode Works

Confidence Assessment

Before taking autonomous action, the agent calculates confidence based on:

Pattern Familiarity (40%)

  • Have I done this exact task before?
  • Does it match learned patterns?
  • How many similar successes?

Code Understanding (30%)

  • Do I understand the codebase?
  • Are dependencies clear?
  • Is the context complete?

Risk Level (20%)

  • Is this a safe operation?
  • Can it be easily undone?
  • Are there side effects?

Task Clarity (10%)

  • Are requirements clear?
  • Is there ambiguity?
  • Do I need more information?

Confidence Thresholds

95-100%: Fully autonomous, no notifications
85-94%:  Autonomous with progress notifications
70-84%:  Proposes approach, asks to proceed
60-69%:  Asks for approval before changes
Below 60%: Multiple approvals, asks questions

Autonomous Workflow Example

Scenario: Adding a New API Endpoint

First Time (Week 1):

You: "Create a products API endpoint"

Agent: [Confidence: 45% - Many questions needed]
"I'll create a products API. Some questions:
- What fields should the product have?
- What routes? (GET, POST, PUT, DELETE?)
- What validation rules?
- Authentication required?
- Response format preference?"

[You answer each question]

Agent: "May I create models/Product.ts?"
You: [Approve]

Agent: "May I create routes/products.ts?"
You: [Approve]

[... 8 more approval requests ...]

Time: 12 minutes
Approvals: 11

Second Time (Week 3):

You: "Create a categories API endpoint"

Agent: [Confidence: 78% - Learned from products]
"I'll create a categories API following the same pattern
as your products endpoint.

Planned structure:
- Model: models/Category.ts
- Routes: routes/categories.ts
- Controller: controllers/categories.controller.ts
- Validation: Using Joi schemas
- Tests: Full CRUD coverage

Proceed with this approach?"

You: "Yes"

[Agent works with minimal approvals]

Time: 4 minutes
Approvals: 1

Third Time (Month 2):

You: "Create a reviews API endpoint"

Agent: [Confidence: 92% - Fully autonomous]
"Creating reviews API with established patterns...

✓ Created models/Review.ts
✓ Created routes/reviews.ts
✓ Created controllers/reviews.controller.ts
✓ Added Joi validation schemas
✓ Implemented CRUD operations
✓ Added authentication middleware
✓ Generated comprehensive tests (24 test cases)
✓ All tests passing

Complete! Reviews API ready at /api/reviews"

Time: 1.5 minutes
Approvals: 0

What Triggers Autonomous Operation?

High Confidence Tasks

1. Repetitive Patterns

After learning your pattern for API endpoints:
- Creates similar endpoints autonomously
- Follows exact file structure
- Uses same libraries and approaches
- Matches code style automatically

2. Safe Operations

Low-risk tasks:
- Reading files (always safe)
- Adding new files (reversible)
- Generating tests (additive)
- Creating documentation (non-critical)

3. Well-Defined Tasks

Clear instructions:
"Add TypeScript types to all function parameters in utils/"
- Scope is clear (utils folder)
- Action is specific (add types)
- Pattern is known (TypeScript)

What Requires Approval

1. High-Risk Operations

Always asks approval:
- Deleting files
- Modifying configuration
- Changing security code
- Database migrations
- Deployment scripts

2. Ambiguous Requests

Unclear instructions:
"Make it better" - Better how?
"Fix the issues" - Which issues?
"Update the API" - What changes?

3. New Territory

Unfamiliar tasks:
- New library or framework
- Unrecognized pattern
- Complex algorithm
- Novel approach needed

Autonomous Workflow Phases

Phase 1: Analysis

What Happens:

Agent:
1. Analyzes your request
2. Identifies required files
3. Checks learned patterns
4. Calculates confidence
5. Plans approach

You See:

"🔍 Analyzing request...
📊 Confidence: 89% (High)
📋 Planning autonomous execution..."

Phase 2: Execution

What Happens:

Agent:
1. Reads necessary files
2. Makes required changes
3. Creates new files
4. Updates imports/exports
5. Generates tests

You See:

"✏️ Modifying src/components/UserProfile.tsx...
📝 Creating src/types/UserProfile.ts...
🧪 Generating tests...
⚡ Running tests..."

Phase 3: Verification

What Happens:

Agent:
1. Runs syntax checks
2. Validates TypeScript types
3. Executes test suite
4. Checks code quality
5. Verifies no regressions

You See:

"✅ Syntax check: PASSED
✅ Type check: PASSED
✅ Tests: 15/15 PASSED
✅ Coverage: 94%"

Phase 4: Reporting

What Happens:

Agent:
1. Summarizes changes
2. Lists modified files
3. Shows test results
4. Notes any issues
5. Suggests next steps

You See:

"✅ Task Complete!

Changes:
- Modified: 3 files
- Created: 2 files
- Tests added: 15

All checks passing. Ready for review."

Controlling Autonomy

Adjusting Confidence Threshold

Settings → Advanced → Autonomous Confidence Threshold

Conservative (0.90-1.0):
- Very few autonomous actions
- Most tasks require approval
- Maximum safety
- Good for: Critical projects, learning phase

Balanced (0.75-0.89):
- Moderate autonomous operation
- Approval for risky changes
- Good balance of speed and safety
- Good for: Most projects (RECOMMENDED)

Aggressive (0.60-0.74):
- Frequent autonomous operation
- Minimal approval requests
- Maximum speed
- Good for: Trusted patterns, experimental projects

Custom:
- Set exact threshold
- Fine-tune to your comfort

Per-Operation Settings

Settings → Auto-Approve

Read Operations:
☑ Auto-approve file reading
☑ Auto-approve directory listing
☑ Auto-approve code searches

Write Operations:
☑ Auto-approve file creation
☑ Auto-approve file modification
☐ Auto-approve file deletion

Execute Operations:
☑ Auto-approve allowed commands
☐ Auto-approve all commands

Advanced Autonomous Workflows

Multi-File Refactoring

Request:

You: "Refactor the authentication system to use a separate AuthService"

Autonomous Execution:

Agent: [Confidence: 87% - Complex but familiar pattern]

"Refactoring authentication system...

Phase 1: Analysis
✓ Identified 8 files using auth logic
✓ Mapped all dependencies
✓ Planned extraction strategy

Phase 2: Create Service
✓ Created services/AuthService.ts
✓ Moved auth logic from controllers
✓ Added TypeScript interfaces

Phase 3: Update Consumers
✓ Updated UserController.ts
✓ Updated LoginController.ts
✓ Updated middleware/auth.ts
✓ Updated 5 other files

Phase 4: Testing
✓ Generated 23 new tests
✓ Updated existing tests
✓ All 45 tests passing

Phase 5: Cleanup
✓ Removed duplicate code
✓ Updated imports
✓ Verified no unused code

Refactoring complete!
- Reduced code duplication by 45%
- Improved test coverage to 92%
- All functionality preserved"

Time: 3 minutes
Your involvement: Initial request only

Feature Implementation

Request:

You: "Add a search feature to the products page with filters"

Autonomous Execution:

Agent: [Confidence: 91% - Known pattern]

"Implementing search feature...

Step 1: Backend API
✓ Created GET /api/products/search endpoint
✓ Added query parameters: q, category, minPrice, maxPrice
✓ Implemented fuzzy search
✓ Added pagination support

Step 2: Frontend Component
✓ Created SearchBar component
✓ Created FilterPanel component
✓ Added debounced search input
✓ Implemented filter checkboxes

Step 3: State Management
✓ Created useProductSearch hook
✓ Added loading and error states
✓ Implemented cache with SWR

Step 4: Integration
✓ Integrated into ProductsPage
✓ Added URL query sync
✓ Implemented result highlighting

Step 5: Testing
✓ Backend tests: 18 cases
✓ Component tests: 12 cases
✓ Integration tests: 8 cases
✓ All tests passing

Search feature complete!
Try it at /products?q=laptop&category=electronics"

Time: 4 minutes

Bug Investigation & Fix

Request:

You: "@mode debug
     Users report that cart totals are sometimes incorrect"

Autonomous Execution:

Agent: [Debug Mode - Confidence: 82%]

"Investigating cart total issue...

Phase 1: Evidence Collection
✓ Reviewed error reports
✓ Analyzed cart calculation code
✓ Checked recent changes
✓ Examined test coverage

Phase 2: Hypothesis Generation
1. Race condition in async updates (65%)
2. Floating point precision issue (25%)
3. Tax calculation error (8%)
4. Currency conversion bug (2%)

Phase 3: Investigation
✓ Tested hypothesis #1: CONFIRMED
✓ Found race condition in CartService.updateQuantity

Root Cause:
Multiple simultaneous quantity updates cause state
inconsistency. Last update wins, losing intermediate changes.

Phase 4: Fix Implementation
✓ Added request debouncing
✓ Implemented optimistic updates with rollback
✓ Added version checking
✓ Improved error handling

Phase 5: Verification
✓ Reproduced original bug: FAILED (good!)
✓ Tested edge cases: All passed
✓ Added regression tests: 8 new tests
✓ Load tested: 100 concurrent updates OK

Bug fixed! Cart totals now accurate even with
rapid updates.

Would you like me to add similar fixes to other
components that might have the same issue?"

Time: 5 minutes

When Autonomy Pauses

Unexpected Situations

Agent Encounters Unknown:

Agent: "I was working autonomously but encountered
       an unfamiliar library configuration.

What I was doing:
- Adding React Query for data fetching

Issue:
- Your project uses a custom Query wrapper
- I'm not familiar with the pattern

Options:
1. Show me an example of your Query wrapper usage
2. Let me research the library documentation
3. Implement standard React Query (may not match your pattern)

Which approach should I take?"

Confidence Drop

During Execution:

Agent: [Started with 88% confidence]

"While implementing the feature, I discovered:
- The User model has a complex validation system
- It's different from what I learned before
- My confidence dropped to 62%

I've completed:
✓ Database schema
✓ Basic API routes

Before I continue with validation, could you confirm:
Should I use the complex User validation pattern or
the simpler Product validation pattern?"

Risk Detection

Safety Check:

Agent: "I was about to modify the authentication
       middleware autonomously, but I detected:

Risk Factors:
- Changes affect all protected routes
- Security-critical code
- No existing tests for this specific middleware

Pausing for approval.

Proposed changes:
[Shows diff]

These changes would affect 47 API endpoints.
Should I proceed?"

Optimizing for Autonomy

1. Establish Clear Patterns Early

First Implementation:

You: "Create a user API endpoint with:
- RESTful routes
- Joi validation
- JWT auth
- Standardized error responses
- 80% test coverage

Use this exact pattern for all future API endpoints."

Result: Future API endpoints work 100% autonomously.

2. Provide Reference Examples

Good Practice:

You: "@src/components/Button.tsx
     This is our standard component pattern.
     Use this structure for all new components."

Result: New components match your pattern automatically.

3. Be Consistent

Inconsistent (Confuses Learning):

File 1: Uses async/await
File 2: Uses .then/.catch
File 3: Uses callbacks

Consistent (Enables Autonomy):

All files: Use async/await consistently

4. Confirm Successful Patterns

After Good Work:

You: "Perfect! This is exactly our pattern.
     Always do API endpoints this way."

Result: Agent confidence increases, more autonomy next time.


Monitoring Autonomous Work

Real-Time Progress

You'll See:

🔄 Autonomous execution in progress...

Current: Generating tests for UserService
Progress: 3/5 steps complete

[View Details] [Pause] [Cancel]

Detailed Logs

Click "View Details":

14:32:15 - Read src/services/UserService.ts
14:32:16 - Analyzed service methods (5 methods)
14:32:17 - Generated test template
14:32:18 - Created tests/UserService.test.ts
14:32:19 - Running tests...
14:32:21 - ✓ All 12 tests passing

Post-Execution Summary

After Completion:

Autonomous Task Complete

Duration: 2m 34s
Operations: 15
Files modified: 4
Tests added: 12
Approvals needed: 0

Changes ready for review.
[View Diff] [Commit] [Undo]

Safety Features

Automatic Rollback

If Tests Fail:

Agent: "Autonomous execution encountered test failures.

Automatically rolling back changes...
✓ Restored original files
✓ Cleared test artifacts

Issue: Type error in generated code
Confidence was too high for this task.

Would you like me to:
1. Try again with manual approval steps
2. Explain what went wrong
3. Research the correct approach"

Change Validation

Before Finalizing:

Agent runs:
✓ Syntax validation
✓ Type checking
✓ Test suite
✓ Lint checks
✓ Import verification

Any failure = automatic rollback

Manual Override

You Can Always:

  • Pause autonomous execution (Esc key)
  • Review changes mid-execution
  • Cancel and rollback
  • Take over manually

Best Practices for Autonomy

✅ Do

  1. Start Conservative

    • Begin with high confidence threshold
    • Lower as you build trust
  2. Establish Patterns

    • Be explicit about preferences early
    • Confirm successful patterns
  3. Use Version Control

    • Easy rollback if needed
    • Track autonomous changes
  4. Review Regularly

    • Check autonomous changes periodically
    • Verify patterns are correct
  5. Provide Feedback

    • Confirm when agent does well
    • Correct when it doesn't

❌ Don't

  1. Don't Skip All Approvals Immediately

    • Build trust gradually
    • Understand how agent works first
  2. Don't Ignore Warnings

    • Agent pauses for good reasons
    • Review risk warnings carefully
  3. Don't Assume Perfection

    • Autonomous doesn't mean infallible
    • Always review critical changes
  4. Don't Mix Patterns

    • Inconsistent code confuses learning
    • Maintain pattern consistency
  5. Don't Disable Safety Checks

    • Keep test validation enabled
    • Maintain rollback capabilities

Troubleshooting Autonomy

"Agent Keeps Asking for Approval"

Check:

  1. Confidence threshold (Settings → Advanced)
  2. Pattern consistency in codebase
  3. Task clarity and specificity
  4. Sufficient similar task history

Fix:

  • Lower confidence threshold
  • Provide clearer instructions
  • Show examples of desired patterns
  • Complete more similar tasks to build confidence

"Agent Works Too Autonomously"

Check:

  1. Current confidence threshold
  2. Auto-approve settings
  3. Recent pattern confirmations

Fix:

  • Raise confidence threshold
  • Adjust auto-approve settings
  • Be more selective with pattern confirmations

"Autonomous Changes Break Tests"

Check:

  1. Test coverage of affected code
  2. Pattern understanding
  3. Edge cases in tests

Fix:

  • Add comprehensive tests first
  • Provide test examples
  • Correct pattern misunderstandings

Future of Autonomous Operation

Coming Soon:

  • Cross-project pattern transfer
  • Team-shared autonomy settings
  • Predictive autonomous suggestions
  • Advanced risk assessment
  • Autonomous optimization suggestions

Summary

Autonomous operation is about:

Trust Building: Week 1 → Month 3 progression from manual to autonomous

Pattern Learning: The more consistent your code, the better autonomy works

Safety First: Multiple validation layers protect your code

Gradual Adoption: Start conservative, increase autonomy as comfortable

Control: You're always in control, can always pause or rollback


Next Steps


Autonomous operation transforms Dropstone Agent from an assistant into a true coding partner. Start slow, build trust, and let the agent handle the heavy lifting.